E-prime and precise language
Introduction
When we use the verb to be we can mean a lot of things, including, but not limited to:
- Identity: “I am Steve.”
- Inclusion/exclusion: “The tomato is a fruit.”
- Predication: “They are excellent.”
- Existence: “There is a reason.”
- Location: “She is there.”
To be, or not to be
The versatile roles to be plays can lead to ambiguity. For example, if I say “this food is good,” what do I really mean?
If I temporarily avoid using to be, I could specify: “you cooked this food skillfully,” “this food tastes good,” or “this food serves a positive moral purpose.”
E-prime
E-prime1 is English excluding all forms of to be.2 People advocate using E-prime for more precise language, such as the example above.
When (not) to use E-prime
E-prime, in eliminating the ambiguity of to be, fits well in technical writing. “Technical” here refers to a need for precision, and “writing” here refers to any medium of communication not in real time. While drafting a philosophy paper, engineering specification, or sensitive text, E-prime can help you clarify your thinking and meaning.
Last year, I tried to integrate E-prime into my everyday conversations. I no longer use E-prime when speaking face-to-face for 2 reasons:
- The awkward pause of trying to think of an alternative to to be can shift the tone and interrupt the flow of conversation.
- Avoiding to be can result in noticeably awkward phrases, especially in the heat of the moment grasping for alternatives to to be. “The tomato is a fruit” becomes “The tomato constitutes a member of the fruit family.” Oof.
Conclusion
If you are going to experiment with E-prime, I would suggest E-prime light. E-prime light is E-prime allowing to be to be used as an auxiliary verb: E-prime light allows “Y'all are sleeping on this new artist,” whereas E-prime does not. E-prime might help you improve your communication, or it might not be right for you.